Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"LOL, B we could use an ignore feature in chat too.. "
1 hour ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
""scam" does not imply against the law, but refers to "the fruit bears witness to the tree"."
1 hour ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"No.  The summary is that EEStor and ZMC are a scam and always have been, and the people that lost their money got what they deserved.  There has been more than enough skeptics here to protect everyone except the willfully self-delusional…"
2 hours ago
PaulCummings55 replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"Another reasoned response- thank you EI!   This has always been a high risk investment and it puzzles me that so many 'believers' cry foul on the ZENN BOD when their high risk investment does not pay off- I mean, it shouldn't…"
2 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Lol, boy, you are stupid. Q=.67 is in no way, shape or form evidence that over unity is possible. so now you throw away all your gripes about LENR where they apply to Fusion research.  this is typical of Patho skeptics. complete inconsistency…"
2 hours ago
energy investor replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"So, Let's sum up.  The folk who are positive that EEStor has something that hasn't been properly tested, reckon that the shareholders had the wool pulled over their eyes at the AGM.  The folk who are positive that EEStor has…"
3 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"I dont think anyone needs your version of Proof. at least so far, it hasnt effected research. mostly, it has only played into a small skepto groupie conspiracy theory.  I suspect that that will dissipate in time just like the quantity of…"
3 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"lol, completely irrelevant to the conversation. "
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"LENR has no proof of concept. A website filled with claims, many of which have been debunked and not a single one substantiated, does not qualify as "proof" or even real evidence. Just pretend evidence. The only "proof" here is…"
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"It is not merely "evidence" that Q>1 is possible; it's proof that Q>1 is possible. It appears that not only don't you know the definition of "fusion" or "evidence" or "proof"; you don't…"
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Yes, and with good reason. There is, for example, plenty of "anecdotal evidence" of alchemists turning lead to gold. Part of the advance into the truly scientific age was the refusal to treat anecdotal evidence as reliable, and to demand…"
3 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to gaga's discussion The Gooch said 5000 times
"Fibb, your astute (now) observation is most probably true. What part of the basic physics did you not yet get? And if you did not get them, why the H did you invest in EEStor in the first place? You got scammed. Get over it, or sue.   I sorrow…"
4 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Andrea Rossi said: It would, of course, help if you actually had a product, instead of merely pretending to have one."
4 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to ee-tom's discussion Why DW's stuff is maybe interesting
"This was explained last year, in terms I had hoped non-experts could understand. Attached again. Were I you, I would not hold much hope for any interesting need met. First attach, the basics of capacitance. Second attach, the basics of the current…"
4 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Yes, but until there is a viable theory and mechanism, there will never be "Pure Scientific Proof."  this does not negate the fact that there is a phenomena going on with LENR.  So as long as research observes anomalous energy…"
4 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion The Gooch said 5000 times
" I believe this is the main issue: JK: ... if it doesn’t show promise under the basic frequencies we measured at it’s not going to show promise in a DC mode.    "
4 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"That's not what they seem to want to do...  too chicken shit for that I guess eh nayboobs? "
5 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"yes, they are all voluntEEring their time for for the past 2+ months for a pittance because they believe Weir is FOS.  Makes all kinds of sense Poopy [O.o]  .... too bad JP said last week that the TAC is involved because they all want a…"
5 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"below... "
5 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" "
5 hours ago

Forum

Why not below 100Hz?

Started by gaga in Scientific Information. Last reply by student 7 minutes ago. 103 Replies

LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread

Started by Futureman in Open Forum. Last reply by Seslaprime 2 hours ago. 6452 Replies

The Gooch said 5000 times

Started by gaga in Scientific Information. Last reply by Nanocarbons 4 hours ago. 6 Replies

What up with Chat?

Started by Yukon in Open Forum. Last reply by Glo-Bug 6 hours ago. 1 Reply

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service