Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"does that mean you bought a $16/share? what's your math here? "
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Yes I am serious, and no, they are not recovering anything. it's all wasted now. They merely measure it. "
1 hour ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Um, dude, are you serious?  .67 means they are recovering 67% of the energy lost.  it is useless. "
1 hour ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Lol, I wont even bother typing slowly, there is no way you can comprehend any of this.  Fusion is a scam, you dont understand that, because you do not get what physics is. Proof of concept has "Never" been established,,,, EVER.…"
1 hour ago
DGDanforth replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"For the record, I am no longer a ZNNMF share holder. I sold at $3.20 and got back about 20% of my investment. "
1 hour ago
Fibb replied to DGDanforth's discussion Wind Energy News
1 hour ago
Arvid replied to Imageoguy's discussion Testing protocol, what's yours?
"I'd never try to test a "layer" for energy storage—I can't even imagine what that would mean. We used to know how many layers were in a "unit" and how thick they were and all that jazz, but failing going to the…"
1 hour ago
Sammyn replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"You guys ever get bored talking about this. "
2 hours ago
Y_Po replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Q=0.67 is not  useless. It says you have to spend 1 watt of electricity and then you get 0.67 watt of heat from fusion. But it is extra heat, large fraction if not most of the 1 watt turns into useful form of heat too. So threshold for useful…"
2 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Sesla, let me type this for you  v e r y  s l o w l y  to help you understand it:Cold fusion/LENR has no proof of concept, period. Real nuclear power had proof of concept demonstrated in 1942, at the University of Chicago. Fusion…"
2 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"LOl, no like I said, irrelevant, there is nothing well established in completely ignoring facts. and that is not working for you skeptos Groupies now is it? we are laughing at you. "
2 hours ago
Lensman replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Let's see: Scientific American says coal fly ash is harmful and has a level of radioactivity which, while low, certainly causes a lot more radioactive contamination of the environment, because it's freely released, while nuclear waste is…"
2 hours ago
Y_Po replied to Imageoguy's discussion Testing protocol, what's yours?
"There are number of good and easy protocols. The mere fact that you people are discussing it shows that something is wrong in this story. Weir claimed huge ED and no leakage in 2007. Simple LED test could have roughly confirmed remarkable ED. It…"
2 hours ago
Lensman replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
" So take your own advice. "
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" "
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" "
3 hours ago
Imageoguy posted a discussion

Testing protocol, what's yours?

There have been lots of discussions about improper testing of layers recently. In light of all info to date, how and with which equipment would you test a Zennstor layer for its energy storage capacity or other possible commercial application?See More
4 hours ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"it would be easier if a head doctor installed "Ignore reality" button in your head. Until then there are some drugs which can help you. "
4 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"LOL, B we could use an ignore feature in chat too.. "
7 hours ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
""scam" does not imply against the law, but refers to "the fruit bears witness to the tree"."
7 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service