Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"BTW, I emailed JK on April 7th.   One of the 3 questions I asked was: "EESU layers previously provided to the TAC by EEStor did not show commercial potential." < is that round about way of saying that the SEAL and tescom…"
7 minutes ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"I know it baffles you... but clearly JK is not stopping the dig.... He is supporting DW and wants to support him much more... Zen and EEStor are not quitting... More money is going to flow towards DW whether you like it or not. JK made that…"
31 minutes ago
DGDanforth replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"So? "
33 minutes ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
38 minutes ago
DGDanforth replied to DGDanforth's discussion SpaceX News
"'Easter Dragon' makes delivery to International Space Station"
47 minutes ago
Kahuna replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
""Ecosystem?" What are you talking about."
58 minutes ago
Nanocarbons posted a discussion

JK and Zenn possible complicity

As this saga winds further down, it might be helpful to aggrieved to put more useful indelible evidence into the public record.As background, all may recall that I called foul Nov 2008 (two grounds, physics and economics), called Zenn stock offer foul June 2009, and began calling fundamental patent foul beginning 2010. All posted here previously.What some have not realized is I also tried to appropriately alert new Zenn management to these issues. Specifics remain confidential for obvious…See More
1 hour ago
Nanocarbons replied to FrankP's discussion The Six Stages of Investor Grief
"Oak, let me give you a little fact help. The chance of winning is actually very very high, given my previous posts. Any business based on a provably perjured patent is more than a little suspect. On contingency fee, gullible investors are liable for…"
3 hours ago
Y_Po replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Yes, the irony. Usually it is a lenrman who is ignorant, wrong and trolling but this time he is not wrong. "
3 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" You're not merely a troll. You're boring. At least try to display some creativity by coming up with an original insult occasionally. "
4 hours ago
Super String replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
" There are two reasons why someone would focus on a small portion of the Earth's ecosystem over a short duration: 1) They have an agenda 2) They're ignorant and don't know better. Which is it?"
4 hours ago
Wasmaba replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Indeed, and for at least the 100th time over, and over. /:) "
6 hours ago
AD2 replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Oh the irony. LOL funny. "
8 hours ago
Lensman replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Well, I certainly wouldn't recommend eating a large quantity of it. But that wasn't your question, was it? Your question was about whether or not a man faced with starvation would eat a fish with trace contamination of radioactive…"
8 hours ago
Oakthicket replied to FrankP's discussion The Six Stages of Investor Grief
"I seriously doubt that there will ever be litigation. If there is, I don't think it will be successful. There is a disparate group of investors, mostly small-time players. (Note: That's disparate, not desperate.) By small-time, I mean…"
9 hours ago
AD2 replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"I think before you go accusing people of being brainwashed, unwitting shills, spouting propaganda cabbage, you should try reading a bit more on the subject. Natural radiation... Potassium is a radioactive element, identified by the chemical symbol…"
12 hours ago
Parallel replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"emoticon child, There would be only half that number but for the rubbish you've posted."
12 hours ago
Parallel replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"ee-tom, What are you talking about?  Distinguish between what?  Real results and your First Law?"
12 hours ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"From comments on joannenova.com "
12 hours ago
ee-tom replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"No. They demonstrate anomalous temperature rise in this case. Yet again you (and perhaps they) fail to distinguish between the two. Bad mistake. Though, I like Letts. He clearly wants to try and firm up his anomalous results to something definite.…"
13 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service