Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

Y_Po replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"There would be not much need for nuclear contamination testing and bans if there were no nuclear plants there. "
37 minutes ago
Lensman replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"I won't suggest there isn't a concern, but there is a lot of testing going on. See links I posted above. Either there is a vast conspiracy by all the testers to show fish being sold on the market are safe when they really are not... or…"
52 minutes ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"LOL... eetom you have a challenger for your position. "
57 minutes ago
Y_Po replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"Fish can swim more than 30 km just fine. And since when fishermen started to comply with bans? And nuclear spills don't have to mix perfectly with ocean water too. "
1 hour ago
Lensman replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
" Funny, that was precisely my reaction to the other thread, entitled "Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists" Which is why I retitled the discussion."
1 hour ago
Wasmaba replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"Is it just me, or should the "subject" or "title" of this thread be amended? Jeeze. "Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists""
1 hour ago
Lensman replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"Yes. So if Japan didn't have a ban on fishing within 30 km of the Fukushima plant-- or rather, a mandate that any fish caught in that area must be discarded-- then it would be something to worry about. Let's keep in mind that…"
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"Yes, fish hanging around Fukishima and then caught and shipped to US is dangerous."
1 hour ago
Lensman replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"But only immediately adjacent to the source of the leak. Strontium 90, the nucleotide in question, is soluble in water.  Therefore, the further the distance from shore, the lower the level should be. To repeat a citation from the above…"
1 hour ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"sean, over the years you've posted some of the dumbest posts ever seen on this site.  no doubt this is the dumbest. "
1 hour ago
Profile IconEnergy Storage News
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to Lensman's discussion Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists
"Potassium 40 is not safer than "unnatural" radionuclides. It's all about dosage, and in that sense "unnatural" radionuclides  have much higher chance of having high dosage, simply becasue they come from highly…"
1 hour ago
Profile IconEnergy Storage

RedFlow's advances zinc bromine battery, creates market opportunity

RedFlow customers who already have energy storage systems developed using AC componentry will be able to receive either of these batteries as ... See More
1 hour ago
Lensman posted a discussion

Inconvenient Facts for Hysterical Anti-Nuclear Apologists

To recap the debate thus far:AD2 posted a link to a hysterical, fear-mongering article which claimed (wrongly) that despite government testing, there are dangerous levels of radioactive materials in fish caught near Japan after the Fukushima accident. A hysterical article blissfully free of any statistics or data on the actual (very low) levels of radioactivity present:AD2 said:And the government's reaction to all of this is to either raise the "safe" level of radiation to which you can be…See More
2 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"There are no fill factors much greater than this 65% because of fundamental math packing theorems previously discussed. Even with extreme polydispersions (particle size variations) a fill factor greater than about 70 percent is impossible. That is…"
2 hours ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
" oh i think nano could have an opinion based what jk has said and done.   "
2 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"Fibb, calm. I do not spend my life here. From above, you asked two questions about the TaC. 1.Competent 2. Trustworthy. Those are different questions. I have no special knowledge on either. You apparently know more. But here are some takes that…"
3 hours ago
DGDanforth replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"ee-tom wrote "Zenn have always, as far as I know,  lacked appropriate technical advise from consultants until they constituted the TAC." You have to remember where ZENN started, as an electric car company using lead acid batteries. "
3 hours ago
FrankP replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"Zawy...What happened when it became apparent that no units were forthcoming in 2007? What was the explanation/story/excuse given by EEStor/Zenn?  "
3 hours ago
FrankP replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"Fibb...How can you ask for other's opinions about a team whose composition is unknown? From your above reply you imply that you know. Do you have an inside track? JK is pulling the strings as far as information release or non-release is…"
3 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service