Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

ee-tom replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"Parallel the models cannot include every short-term random forcing. For example, in the 1990s they underpredicted observed warming substantially. That does not make them wrong. And I'd take you (and the few maverick deniers you proxy) more…"
1 minute ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"It is just one of many actual measured data bases that show the IPCC computer models have exaggerated the warming and so far there is little cause for alarm. How do you explain the believers wailing that the science is settled, deniers should go to…"
19 minutes ago
ee-tom replied to FrankP's discussion The Six Stages of Investor Grief
"Well, I agree with this. Except that what can be successfully litigated depends on human feelings also, and whether the Zenn incompetence, or DW delusion, in this case is litigable in the US as a civil action likely to succeed I don't know. "
23 minutes ago
Oakthicket replied to FrankP's discussion The Six Stages of Investor Grief
"Nano I disagree. I have no issue with the facts you've outlined. Those are not nearly enough to win litigation. Intent needs to proved, and it cannot. You're assuming that Weir is a rational, logical thinking person. He is not. He is…"
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"In Ponzi scheme current "shareholders" are not interested in truth and subsequent crash. They are interested in selling their crap to new "shareholders"."
1 hour ago
Antipodean replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"Rud I am a shareholder who is keeping all his options open at the moment, but sadly for you I don't see what you see. JK's rejection of your advances is from my point of view as a shareholder the right move. When you expressed your…"
2 hours ago
ee-tom replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"That reply is almost enough for me to make a fuss, here. I don't like corporate double-think. Fibb - you and (to a much lesser extent) Nano share an Aristotelian world-view that leads you astray. Human motivations are just not so simple. That…"
3 hours ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"BTW, I emailed JK on April 7th.   One of the 3 questions I asked was: "EESU layers previously provided to the TAC by EEStor did not show commercial potential." < is that round about way of saying that the SEAL and tescom…"
5 hours ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"I know it baffles you... but clearly JK is not stopping the dig.... He is supporting DW and wants to support him much more... Zen and EEStor are not quitting... More money is going to flow towards DW whether you like it or not. JK made that…"
5 hours ago
DGDanforth replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
"So? "
5 hours ago
Fibb replied to Nanocarbons's discussion JK and Zenn possible complicity
6 hours ago
DGDanforth replied to DGDanforth's discussion SpaceX News
"'Easter Dragon' makes delivery to International Space Station"
6 hours ago
Kahuna replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
""Ecosystem?" What are you talking about."
6 hours ago
Nanocarbons posted a discussion

JK and Zenn possible complicity

As this saga winds further down, it might be helpful to aggrieved to put more useful indelible evidence into the public record.As background, all may recall that I called foul Nov 2008 (two grounds, physics and economics), called Zenn stock offer foul June 2009, and began calling fundamental patent foul beginning 2010. All posted here previously.What some have not realized is I also tried to appropriately alert new Zenn management to these issues. Specifics remain confidential for obvious…See More
7 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to FrankP's discussion The Six Stages of Investor Grief
"Oak, let me give you a little fact help. The chance of winning is actually very very high, given my previous posts. Any business based on a provably perjured patent is more than a little suspect. On contingency fee, gullible investors are liable for…"
8 hours ago
Y_Po replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Yes, the irony. Usually it is a lenrman who is ignorant, wrong and trolling but this time he is not wrong. "
9 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" You're not merely a troll. You're boring. At least try to display some creativity by coming up with an original insult occasionally. "
9 hours ago
Super String replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
" There are two reasons why someone would focus on a small portion of the Earth's ecosystem over a short duration: 1) They have an agenda 2) They're ignorant and don't know better. Which is it?"
10 hours ago
Wasmaba replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Indeed, and for at least the 100th time over, and over. /:) "
11 hours ago
AD2 replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Oh the irony. LOL funny. "
14 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service