"anyone ever think that its the government forcing Eestor and Zenn to withhold information temporarily because the world is not ready for the truth and that it would be a threat to the economy as we know it."
"I thought you were making progress parallel, interested in teh science. Now you are back to "one paper says what I like and its settled".
All of the science here is shot full of assumptions, and all of it is therefore uncertain. It is only…"
Typical non sequitur from a member of the group-think clan. It doesn't take more than one piece of evidence or one paper to upset the settled science, if it's right. Fifty papers that only got grants because the…"
"I agree that JK not releasing the DE test report is difficult to understand, except that it is embarrassing and opens "the past" which JK does not wish to dwell upon.
I also agree that an update on the previously claimed DW Jan testing…"
"Here's what gets me. I understand that there's a replacement cost for these folks and Natasha is key for holding things together administratively. The $90K bonus for JK is a terrible message and the overall compensation is pretty big under…"
"And here what seems to be the start of an understanding of how Nic Lewis managed to get the outlying low figure. He guessed at aerosol forcing (against the weight of evidence) and with such an oulying value of this he gets an outlying value of…"
"Well it will be most interesting to see. Perhaps you have some conspiracy theory for DW's incompetent mismeasurement. I'm careful about saying things. I am saying that the misinterpretations in the TesCom report and associated EEstor PR…"
You say (without reading the Lewis and Crok paper) you "find no reason to disagree with the conclusions of Forster"
Here is Lewis' response.
Nic Lewis says:
March 6, 2014 at 1:54 pm
Piers Forster Hi Piers, I’ve…"
"There is no chance in hell tom. Whether dw has a lot or a little he definitely has more than you think. And your various mischarcaterizarions of dw and current events through the years is not forgivable by any means regardless. As…"
Your post at the top of the page is just a continuation of your ad hominem response that does NOTHING for the scientific debate. As I said, I could provide references that show you are wrong, but I’d rather stick…"
"Try reading The Martian by Andy Weir. It's fiction but the author did a pretty thorough job of making sure things were technically and scientifically plausible and accurate and only referenced technology that exists in some form today.
"The really exciting thing about climate science is that the major sources of natural variability, like ocean currents and associated weather systems, ice melting/freezing, glaciers moving, methane clathrates sublimating, volcanic and anthrogenic…"