Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

Lensman replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
"Let's see: Scientific American says coal fly ash is harmful and has a level of radioactivity which, while low, certainly causes a lot more radioactive contamination of the environment, because it's freely released, while nuclear waste is…"
57 seconds ago
Y_Po replied to Imageoguy's discussion Testing protocol, what's yours?
"There are number of good and easy protocols. The mere fact that you people are discussing it shows that something is wrong in this story. Weir claimed huge ED and no leakage in 2007. Simple LED test could have roughly confirmed remarkable ED. It…"
6 minutes ago
Lensman replied to AD2's discussion Uncomfortable truths for uranium nuclear power apologists
" So take your own advice. "
9 minutes ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" "
18 minutes ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
" "
22 minutes ago
Imageoguy posted a discussion

Testing protocol, what's yours?

There have been lots of discussions about improper testing of layers recently. In light of all info to date, how and with which equipment would you test a Zennstor layer for its energy storage capacity or other possible commercial application?See More
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"it would be easier if a head doctor installed "Ignore reality" button in your head. Until then there are some drugs which can help you. "
1 hour ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"LOL, B we could use an ignore feature in chat too.. "
4 hours ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
""scam" does not imply against the law, but refers to "the fruit bears witness to the tree"."
4 hours ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"No.  The summary is that EEStor and ZMC are a scam and always have been, and the people that lost their money got what they deserved.  There has been more than enough skeptics here to protect everyone except the willfully self-delusional…"
5 hours ago
PaulCummings55 replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"Another reasoned response- thank you EI!   This has always been a high risk investment and it puzzles me that so many 'believers' cry foul on the ZENN BOD when their high risk investment does not pay off- I mean, it shouldn't…"
5 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Lol, boy, you are stupid. Q=.67 is in no way, shape or form evidence that over unity is possible. so now you throw away all your gripes about LENR where they apply to Fusion research.  this is typical of Patho skeptics. complete inconsistency…"
5 hours ago
energy investor replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"So, Let's sum up.  The folk who are positive that EEStor has something that hasn't been properly tested, reckon that the shareholders had the wool pulled over their eyes at the AGM.  The folk who are positive that EEStor has…"
6 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"I dont think anyone needs your version of Proof. at least so far, it hasnt effected research. mostly, it has only played into a small skepto groupie conspiracy theory.  I suspect that that will dissipate in time just like the quantity of…"
6 hours ago
Seslaprime replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"lol, completely irrelevant to the conversation. "
6 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"LENR has no proof of concept. A website filled with claims, many of which have been debunked and not a single one substantiated, does not qualify as "proof" or even real evidence. Just pretend evidence. The only "proof" here is…"
6 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"It is not merely "evidence" that Q>1 is possible; it's proof that Q>1 is possible. It appears that not only don't you know the definition of "fusion" or "evidence" or "proof"; you don't…"
6 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Yes, and with good reason. There is, for example, plenty of "anecdotal evidence" of alchemists turning lead to gold. Part of the advance into the truly scientific age was the refusal to treat anecdotal evidence as reliable, and to demand…"
6 hours ago
Nanocarbons replied to gaga's discussion The Gooch said 5000 times
"Fibb, your astute (now) observation is most probably true. What part of the basic physics did you not yet get? And if you did not get them, why the H did you invest in EEStor in the first place? You got scammed. Get over it, or sue.   I sorrow…"
7 hours ago
Lensman replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Andrea Rossi said: It would, of course, help if you actually had a product, instead of merely pretending to have one."
7 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service