Website Full Disclosure  Do not use this website for investment advice.                                                   New Chat Rooms

Latest Activity

zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
" From May, 2004 UFTO notes mailing list.... "I first talked to them in early 2003" " present data: Energy density, Wh/L     606, Specific energy, Wh/kg   273, $61/kwh" "Long term:…"
21 minutes ago
zawy replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"OK, so 10 years after their patent had test data 1 million times better than this, and an EXTRA $18 million, mostly from ZMC investor retards, they don't have the equipment to do a basic test like the one they supposedly did 10 years ago?"
31 minutes ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
" He prominently and enthusiastically starred in it :) "
1 hour ago
mjt replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"Don't think that was released by Weir. :) "
1 hour ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"You forgot energy-IN video, it was not AC test :) "
2 hours ago
mjt replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"And yet, every test result released by Weir was an AC test.  No worries about that? "
2 hours ago
Y_Po posted a status
"Friedrich Prinz is a filthy liar, fraud and thief"
2 hours ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"Kofman is correct. If it does not work at low frrequency AC (and it does not) then it will not work at DC. slow AC is DC, gooch himself said that. The reason why TAC does not like below 100Hz is because it does not work at all at these frequencies…"
2 hours ago
Tecnófilo replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"I think so and only disagree in one word: "demonstrates". Eestor and demonstration in the same sentence is an oxymoron. But I even speculate whether the huge leakage current seen in P&D show video is compatible with this idea of huge…"
3 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"I believe this is the main issue: .... TECHIES.... weigh in ... JK:  if it doesn’t show promise under the basic frequencies we measured at it’s not going to show promise in a DC mode.    Is this right or wrong.... ^^^^^^…"
3 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"I just transposed some more AGM audio... GG:  …to ascribe any value to DC capacitance by measuring AC is the height of ridiculousness, technically.  Roger, do you agree?   RH:  Dick has… has said that.  I…"
3 hours ago
Y_Po replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
" "
3 hours ago
Y_Po replied to Y_Po's discussion Pissed off (former) believers thread
" Gooch is always listening to Dick. "
3 hours ago
Y_Po commented on B's blog post Remember When Ulrich Taught Us How To Test?
"actually, it leaks in 0.5 milliseconds"
3 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"There are still idiots (mostly anonymous) who come into chat and throw mud at DW's work, abilities and character - saying in effect it's a complete scam and that JK et. al are only lookin for ways to limit their…"
3 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"JK said more or less they are still pursuing energy storage JK at the AGM:  We are still a long way from the goal of inventing the holy grail of energy storage to replace batteries... we still believe that it is a goal worth…"
4 hours ago
Brian replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"The other problem is that ZENN does not have any real shareholders. If a real shareholder was involved with ZENN they would demand the DC tests or JK would lose his job tomorrow. The real shareholders are not saying anything….except for…"
4 hours ago
Brian replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"ZENN may be clueless…but JP is not.  "
4 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
"FIXED for you. "
4 hours ago
Fibb replied to gaga's discussion Why not below 100Hz?
" "
4 hours ago

Members

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service