Disclosure | Energy Storage Feeds

ee-tom
  • Male
  • London
  • United Kingdom
Share Twitter
  • Blog Posts
  • Discussions (4830)
  • Events
  • Groups
  • Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Videos

Ee-tom's Friends

  • Haggle
  • Eric Olthwaite

ee-tom's Discussions

Quantifying the Consensus

Started this discussion. Last reply by ee-tom May 23. 26 Replies

The AGW thread on this site is designed for scientific discussion about the facts of AGW. That mostly got thrashed out in the early days, and new data, while to me intensely interesting, does not…Continue

The Gooch screws Fibb

Started this discussion. Last reply by ee-tom Apr 27. 20 Replies

From B's characteristically uncritical interview with Gooch:Basically what Dick does is he makes up a sample and in the space of a week, probably makes up 4 different samples. Sometimes it will be…Continue

Why DW's stuff is maybe interesting

Started this discussion. Last reply by student Apr 16. 25 Replies

I have not written tech stuff properly here for a while, because there has not been much new to say.Now, however, we do have something interesting. I'm basing this post on two data:(1) we are told…Continue

Questions for Zenn

Started this discussion. Last reply by brianjones Mar 18. 19 Replies

It should not be needed, but reading comments here perhaps it is.(1) Do you have any significant new evidence, since JK took charge of Zenn, that EEstor have any advanced technology, other than that…Continue

Gifts Received

Gift

ee-tom has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

ee-tom's Page

Latest Activity

ee-tom replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"You know that the first test could have been loopback spoofed. So it cannot be "obvious" that his stuff works from that - even ignoring other more complex or simpler problems. Why do you assume the second test will introduce any better…"
13 minutes ago
ee-tom replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
""too" - who are you agreeing with? As I've pointed out the IPCC have not ignored the uncertainty in the tail probabilities. That is why they do not give a PDF. And while I'd like them to agree with me I can know that…"
16 minutes ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"ee-tom, I think I answered this in my previous post. "
1 hour ago
ee-tom replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"Rossi is clever. As always the technical definition of scam as fraud is very difficult to prove, because it requires intent and decption of investors: we have no idea what investors have been told. But he has certainly deceived the public, people…"
4 hours ago
ee-tom replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"Parallel - would you care to expand on this post a bit - I don't quite understand the use of "too" - nor what you are saying about your own judgement of likely ECS. If you mean you think ECS median value ~2C (the most warmist…"
4 hours ago
ee-tom replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"The IPCC did not get anything wrong. The literature at the time was wrong. Had I been on IPCC I would not have been able to advocate using bayesian techniques becayse although an excellent thing to do it had not at that time (5 years before the…"
5 hours ago
WalksOnDirt replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"It was active the day before this one started, so I am surprised you missed it.  Plus there were other climate change threads before that you posted in.  Still, you didn't respond in that thread, so I am willing to believe you…"
11 hours ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"WOD, Your link to ee-tom's post was before this thread started, so no surprise I hadn't seen it.  If I had I would have had a more favorable impression of ee-tom, who as far as I could see was defending Mann's hockey stick at…"
11 hours ago
WalksOnDirt replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
" Well, I remember.  Here's a link. "
15 hours ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"ee-tom, I don't recall you ever saying the IPCC got anything wrong so I doubt you did two years ago - without a link. I think the ECS is more likely to be <2C too.  The MDO's from Akasofu's graph look to have ~60 year cycle…"
16 hours ago
ee-tom replied to AD2's discussion The news from Fukushima doesn't look good, and yet tyranny is still championed
"It says that at very high doses radioactivity can have biological effects. The levels here are some 10,000 X higehr than natural background. The (ridiculously low) US regulatory dose limits are some 10X lower than natural background. The…"
18 hours ago
ee-tom replied to Futureman's discussion LENR or "Cold Fusion" Thread
"LOL. You can never be wrong saying that! Care to put a limit on the length of the scams? BLP? Rossi? "
18 hours ago
ee-tom replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"LOL. Kahuna you must I think have a very short attention span. I highlighted the issue about proper Bayesian priors for ECS about 2 years ago on this thread, noting that James Annan (a well-known climate scientist, one of parallel's…"
19 hours ago
Kahuna replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"But Parallel you don't understand that "the pause" merely represents the noise (i.e. chaos) of a larger timescale.  This of course begs the following Q&A with tp and eetom:   QUESTION:  How long a…"
20 hours ago
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"Nick Lewis has a paper published showing that AR4 made a mistake resulting in an overestimation of certainty.  This mistake appears to have been carried over to AP5 as well.Probably best to read Lewis' post about the paper first.  The…"
yesterday
Parallel replied to ee-tom's discussion Let's play Hockey
"Technopete, Your graph with a cherry picked start and ending short of currently available data is something you and ee-tom accept as you will blindly believe anything that supports your IPCC religion. But it does not start to explain the 18 year…"
yesterday

Profile Information

Are you currently invested in Zenn Motor Company?
no
Do you understand that this website is not intended to provide you with legal, business or investment advice and that if you attempt to utilize it in that way, you are a fool?
yes
Have you read & agreed with the Terms of Service?
yes
It asks for your Full Name but you can use an alias if you like.
ok

Comment Wall (1 comment)

At 4:58am on March 30, 2012, Tom Villars said…

Welcome back.

You need to be a member of TheEEStory to add comments!

Join TheEEStory

 
 
 

...

© 2014   Created by B.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service